UN body rejects discussion on China human rights abuses: ‘Failed the test to uphold its core mission’

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on Thursday voted against debating potential human rights abuses in China’s Xinjiang region against the Uyghur population.

“We are disappointed that, by a narrow margin, the Council was unable to agree to hold a discussion about serious human rights concerns raised in the recent independent assessment by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights that is part of a growing body of expressed concerns by credible sources,” Ambassador Michele Taylor, U.S. permanent representative to the UNHRC and co-sponsor on the motion, wrote in a statement following the vote.

“No country should be immune from a discussion at the Council,” she continued. “We will continue to work closely with our partners to seek justice and accountability for victims of human rights abuses and violations, including the Uyghurs in Xinjiang.”

KICKING RUSSIA OUT OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL ‘NOT THE RIGHT SOLUTION’ ARGUES SPOKESMAN

Richard Goldberg, former National Security Council official and director of the international organizations program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, urged Congress to take action that will keep the U.S. from involving itself with organizations that “legitimizes human rights abusers.”

“The Biden administration reversed U.S. policy and rejoined the U.N. Human Rights Council, arguing it could reform the council from within,” Goldberg told Fox News Digital. “Instead, we now see the folly of that decision — failing to even win a vote to debate a genocide in Xinjiang while the council’s open-ended antisemitic commission of inquiry into Israel proceeds apace.”

“It’s time for Congress to consider legislation prohibiting U.S. membership in a council that legitimizes human rights abusers and fuels antisemitism,” he added.

The UNHRC released a report at the end of August in which it detailed concerns regarding China’s detention of the Uyghur population, recommending that the government “take prompt steps to release all individuals arbitrarily deprived of their liberty in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR)” and “clarifies the whereabouts of individuals whose families have been seeking information about their loved ones,” among other measures.

But the 48-member council ended up rejecting a motion tabled by the U.S. and Norway, and backed by the United Kingdom and Canada, with 19 against, 17 for and 11 abstentions. The most notable rejections include Venezuela, Cuba and Indonesia, while Brazil, India, Mexico and Ukraine were notable abstentions.

UNHRC spokesperson Rolando Gomez told Fox News Digital that no other motion can be considered in the current session, which concludes tomorrow, as the deadline for submission of draft resolutions passed. He stressed that the vote does not change the ability for other bodies and states to continue addressing the issue in Xinjiang.

“While the human rights situation in Xinjiang will not be formally placed on the agenda of the Human Rights Council with the rejection of today’s resolution, only the second time in the history of the council, this situation can still be raised by states and NGOs during general debates at the human rights body, as has been the case for the past few years, given the possibility for any human rights situation to be raised at the council,” Gomez said.

CHINA STILL BENEFITS FROM RUSSIA RELATIONSHIP, EVEN WITH INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION AT RISK: EXPERTS

Amnesty International lambasted the HRC, saying it “failed the test to uphold its core mission” to “protect the victims of human rights violations everywhere.”

“Today’s vote protects the perpetrators of human rights violations rather than the victims — a dismaying result that puts the UN’s main human rights body in the farcical position of ignoring the findings of the UN’s own human rights office,” the organization said in a press release.

BOWING TO PUTIN’S ‘NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL’ WOULD LEAD CHINA TO INVADE TAIWAN: EX-NATO CHIEF

“For Council member states to vote against even discussing a situation where the U.N. itself says crimes against humanity may have occurred makes a mockery of everything the Human Rights Council is supposed to stand for,” the statement continued. “Member states’ silence — or worse, blocking of debate — in the face of the atrocities committed by the Chinese government further sullies the reputation of the Human Rights Council.”

“Political and economic interests should not trump serious human rights concerns, and no state should be shielded from scrutiny at the Human Right Council.”

Amnesty International vowed to continue pushing for accountability and “justice and truth” for the victims and their families, saying the UNHRC must revisit the vote “at the earliest.”

Former President Donald Trump withdrew from the council in 2018, with then-United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley criticizing the council as “a protector of human rights abusers and a cesspool of political bias.”

The Biden administration rejoined the much-maligned U.N. Human Rights Council and ran for election last year. Having successfully won a seat, it formally rejoined the council at the beginning of this year.

Reuters contributed to this report.