DOJ ‘getting very close’ to indicting Trump

​Former Attorney General Bill Barr has said he believes the Justice Department is “getting very close” to gathering the evidence it needs to indict former President Donald Trump for improperly keeping classified documents at his Florida home.

Barr, who said last week that he knew of “no legitimate reason” for the 45th president to store sensitive material at Mar-a-Lago, told Fox News Wednesday that prosecutors must decide whether they will be able to “make a technical case” against Trump and if have the evidence to indict.

“That’s the first question, and I think they’re getting very close to that point, frankly,” Barr said.

The second question, the ex-AG went on, is fraught with political risk: “Do you indict a former president?”

“What will that do to the country? What kind of precedent will that set? Will the people really understand that this is not, you know, failing to return a library book, that this was serious?” wondered Barr, who served as Trump’s attorney general between January 2019 and December 2020.

Former President Donald Trump blasted the Department of Justice for conducting a deeply partisan investigation on his Mar-a-Lago estate.
James Devaney/GC Images

“And so you have to worry about those things, and I hope that those kinds of factors will incline the administration not to indict him, because I don’t want to see him indicted as a former president.”

But Barr also said that he believes current Attorney General Merrick Garland faces a lot of pressure to indict the former president because of the perception of fairness.

“One question is, ‘Look, if anyone else would have gotten indicted, why not indict him?’” Barr asked.

An aerial view of former U.S. President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home after Trump said that FBI agents searched it, in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S. August 15, 2022.
Former Attorney General Bill Barr criticized former President Donald Trump for keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
REUTERS/Marco Bello/File
n this July 11, 2019, file photo, Attorney General William Barr, left, and President Donald Trump turn to leave after speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House, in Washington.
Former Attorney General William Barr previously took swipes at President Donald Trump during their time at the White House.
AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File

The FBI raided Trump’s beachfront estate on Aug. 8 and removed ​hundreds of highly sensitive documents​, including ​top secret materials about a foreign government’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities. the Washington Post reported Tuesday.​

The report came a day after US District Court Judge ​Aileen Cannon agreed to Trump’s request to appoint a special master to review the seized documents and separate out materials protected by attorney-client or executive privilege.

​Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, ​said in her order that some of the materials swept up in the raid ​included “medical documents, correspondence related to taxes and accounting information.”​

Former Attorney General Bill Barr on Fox News.
Former Attorney General Bill Barr claims the Department of Justice is mounting enough evidence to indict former President Donald Trump.
Fox News
This undated file photo released by the US Department of Justice on August 31, 2022 shows a photo attached as evidence to a court filing by the US District Court Southern District of Florida, of documents allegedly seized at Mar-a-Lago spread over a carpet.
Former Attorney General William Barr compared former President Donald Trump’s classified documents to overdue library books.
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/AFP via Getty Images

Her ruling effectively blocks the ​Justice Department’s main avenue of investigation, at least temporarily.

​Barr, in a Tuesday appearance on Fox News, ​called Cannon’s ruling “deeply flawed” and said he hoped the Justice Department appealed the decision.

​”​I don’t think the appointment of a special master is going to hold up, but even if it does, I don’t see it fundamentally changing the trajectory,” he said.

The former attorney general explained that the facts of the case don’t relate to the content of the documents, “it relates to the fact that there were documents there and the fact that they were classified and the fact that they were subpoenaed and never delivered.”

Read the full article Here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DON’T MISS OUT!
Subscribe To Newsletter
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Stay Updated
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.
close-link