Europe’s thriving businesses face mounting windfall tax hit
Receive free Corporation tax updates
We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Corporation tax news every morning.
European governments are increasingly turning to windfall taxes to balance their books and tackle public uproar over companies making high profits during the worst cost of living crisis in decades.
The Italian government’s surprise levy on banks on August 8 was the latest example of a trend that began when power prices surged in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, delivering bumper revenues to energy companies.
The taxes were originally imposed on the energy industry. But they are increasingly spreading to other sectors as politicians, hit by the rise in interest rates and higher government spending, seek to plug budget deficits.
“We’ve got this European wave of windfall taxes and that’s clearly in response to revenue shortfalls in government,” said Grant Wardell-Johnson, head of global tax policy at KPMG.
Data from KPMG and the Tax Foundation show that more than 30 windfall taxes, several of which now cover multiple sectors, have been introduced or proposed across Europe since the start of 2022.
A total of 24 EU countries have announced, proposed or implemented a windfall tax on energy companies, which European Commission officials put forward after energy prices soared at the start of 2022. The UK has also imposed a levy on profits made from the extraction of oil and gas from the North Sea.
But banks have increasingly become a target, with the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Spain and now Italy imposing charges on the sector. Latvia could follow.
In other countries, the sectors covered by windfall taxes have become even more widespread. Hungary has imposed levies on all financial institutions, including insurance companies, as well as pharmaceutical groups. Portugal introduced a 33 per cent levy on food distributors with excess profits generated in 2022 and 2023.
Croatia has gone further still, introducing a windfall tax that potentially applies to all companies that report a revenue above K300mn (€40mn) for 2022. Bulgaria is also planning an economy-wide windfall tax.
Windfall taxes beyond banks and energy — Bulgaria and Hungary
Bulgaria
• Bulgaria is planning a windfall tax that will hit all sectors.
• In March 2023, the country’s finance ministry published a proposal for the introduction of a ‘temporary solidarity contribution’ on all businesses, in addition to the existing windfall tax on the country’s fossil fuel industry.
• The excess profits tax would apply to all corporate taxpayers as well as to sole traders at a rate of 33 per cent of extra profits generated between July and December 2023.
• Extra profits would be calculated as the taxable profits in accordance with corporate tax law that were above 50 per cent of the average taxable profit of the preceding four fiscal years increased by 20 per cent.
• Alternatively, taxpayers would be able to opt for an extra profits calculation based on 50 per cent of taxable profits in 2023 instead of all profits generated in the period July to December 2023.
HUngary
• Hungary’s most recent windfall taxes have targeted pharmaceutical and insurance companies, in addition to banks and energy producers.
• In November 2022, the country’s government published decrees modifying the windfall profits taxes introduced in July 2022 with a temporary tax surcharge of 1-7 per cent levied on insurance companies.
• In December 2022, the government published a decree to expand the scope of windfall profit taxes to the pharmaceuticals industry, applicable for 2022 and 2023. Windfall profits generated by pharmaceuticals producers became subject to an addition tax of 1-8 per cent depending on turnover, with companies with revenue over Ft150bn (around €390mn) paying the top rate.
Some industry experts have criticised governments for increasingly resorting to windfall taxes, with one adviser telling the Financial Times that the levies were generally “an admission of policy failure” and risked deterring future investment.
Cristina Enache, global tax economist at the Tax Foundation, a US think-tank, said such measures “would penalise domestic production and punitively target certain industries without a sound tax base”.
While the original EU-wide “solidarity contribution” from energy companies was set to run only until December 2023, countries including Spain, Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic plan to levy them into 2024 and in some cases 2025. The UK’s levy is legislated to end in March 2028.
However, tax justice campaigners say governments are right to tax companies making record profits at a time when the rise in the cost of essentials such as power and food has left many people struggling financially.
“Windfall taxes appeal because they’re intuitively fair,” said Christian Hallum, tax justice policy lead at Oxfam. “We have a situation where millions of people are facing hardship and many corporations are making record profits. It’s simply not fair.”
The IMF has also argued in favour of levies on excess profits becoming a permanent feature of the tax system.
“[This] is superior to relying on ex-post one-off windfall taxes on particular firms or sectors,” said Shafik Hebous, deputy division chief of the IMF’s fiscal affairs department.
Windfall taxes beyond banks and energy — Portugal and Croatia
PORTUGAL
• Portugal’s parliament has targeted the food industry with its most recent windfall tax.
• In December 2022, a bill was approved that introduced of a ‘temporary solidarity contribution’ on the food distribution sector.
CROATIA
• In December 2022, the country’s parliament approved a law introducing a windfall tax prompted by EU regulation on high energy prices but broadened the scope significantly.
• The ‘Extra Profit Tax’ would be applicable in fiscal year 2022 to all corporate taxpayers with a total income exceeding K300mn (around €40mn) in that year.
• The tax would be levied at a rate of 33 per cent on extra profit generated in fiscal year 2022 with extra profit calculated as the taxable profit in accordance with corporate tax law that was above 20 per cent of the average taxable profit of the preceding four fiscal years.
Others in the industry agree that the shift in the economic climate has led to governments increasingly viewing windfall taxes as a viable option to raise revenues.
“What the pandemic did — apart from give rise to the need for cash for governments — was it produced winners and losers,” said Wardell-Johnson. “A windfall tax is much more attractive in that environment. As, if you were to raise taxes across the board, it would have a lot of economic damage.”
Before the outbreak of war in Ukraine, such taxes had not been widely used in decades. The levies were first introduced over a century ago in Europe during the first world war.
In 1915, Denmark introduced the Gulasch tax, named after the German stew, on Danish food exporters that continued to trade with Germany during the war. At least 22 countries, including the UK, US, France, Italy and Germany, adopted some form of extra tax on “excess” corporate profits during the conflict. The second world war also saw the use of windfall taxes by the UK, Canada and the US.
Other more recent examples include a windfall tax on crude oil enacted by the US government in 1980 and a 1981 one-off bank levy introduced by Margaret Thatcher’s British government. The UK’s Labour government also brought in a windfall tax on utilities in 1997, arguing that the previous Conservative government had sold off the companies cheaply.
Read the full article Here